Why 'Right-Wing' Has Become a Disparaging Label
Konstantin Kisin explains that calling someone 'right-wing' is often used to discredit their ideas rather than engage with them. The label implies moral inferiority — that even if someone's position is factually correct, they're seen as cruel or callous. This framing discourages honest debate and shifts focus from arguments to perceived motives.
- The term 'right-wing' is used as a moral slur, suggesting someone is factually right but morally wrong.
- It's a way to dismiss ideas without countering them logically.
- People increasingly judge intentions over outcomes, which undermines productive discourse.
- Kisin notes that beliefs once considered universal or liberal — like free speech — have been rebranded as right-wing over time.
“The caricature of the left is that they're wrong but well-meaning, and of the right is that they're factually more correct but evil, callous, and…”