Why the Study Was Retracted — And Why It’s a Sham
J. Michael Bailey explains that his study was retracted not due to fraud or scientific error, but because transgender activists pressured the publisher over the controversial idea of rapid onset gender dysphoria (ROGD). He argues the retraction was politically motivated and has backfired, drawing far more attention to the paper.
- The study was retracted due to political pressure, not scientific misconduct.
- Bailey calls the retraction a 'sham' and says it was based on ideological opposition.
- The paper has been downloaded nearly 100,000 times, indicating massive public interest.
- Retraction did not block access, as the paper was open access.
“Our article was retracted because of the ideas and the evidence it presented that angered transgender activists.”