Peer Review Doesn't Catch Fraud
The peer review system fails to detect scientific fraud. Most fraud cases are uncovered long after publication, often by outsiders, not reviewers. The system consumes vast resources without preventing misconduct.
- Peer review rarely catches data fabrication or falsification.
- High-profile fraud cases are typically exposed years after peer-reviewed publication.
- The process consumes 15,000 person-years annually without clear benefits.
- Real accountability comes from post-publication scrutiny, not pre-publication review.
“You should hear lots of stories of reviewers catching fake data. You never hear a story like that.”