MModern Wisdom
← All episodes
James Smith28 July 2022

Can Men & Women Be Friends Again? - James Smith - #505

0Frameworks
10Insights

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 1

Myth Buster13:30

The Hypocrisy of 'Ick' Culture

James calls out the double standard in 'ick' culture: women freely express what they find unattractive in men online, yet men face backlash for similar hypotheticals. He argues this creates a one-sided dynamic where men are shamed for imagination while women's critiques are normalized.

  • Women openly share 'icks' about men on TikTok without consequence.
  • Men are labeled misogynistic for playful hypotheticals like 'she's a 10 but...'.
  • The outrage is often performative—commenters stay to try to change the person.
  • True offense would lead to disengagement, not public shaming.

Girls have been expressing their icks about guys for clout on social media for about a year now. So if I'm not allowed to make…

James Smith · 14:20
#dating-culture#social-media#gender-double-standards

Hot Take· 2

Hot Take10:50

Men and Women Are Being Told They're on Different Teams

James argues that modern gender dynamics are framed as adversarial, with men and women encouraged to see each other as opponents rather than collaborators. He believes this tribal mindset undermines the historical reality that societies have always depended on cooperation between genders to function.

  • Men and women are increasingly portrayed as being on opposing teams.
  • This narrative ignores the fact that functional societies require gender cooperation.
  • Social media tribalism fuels division by encouraging identity-based conflict.
  • The idea that 'oppression comes from within'—women policing women—is often overlooked.

Men and women have somehow been convinced that they're playing on different teams. I don't think that men and women have been on different teams…

James Smith · 10:55
#gender-dynamics#social-media#tribalism
Hot Take26:00

Fame No Longer Rewards Real Achievement

James critiques how fame has become detached from merit, citing reality TV and viral TikTok moments as paths to status without effort. This shift undermines the value of hard work and encourages people to seek luck over discipline, distorting societal values.

  • Fame is now achievable through luck, not skill or effort.
  • Reality TV and viral content reward randomness over consistency.
  • This decoupling discourages long-term dedication.
  • People now hope to be 'plucked from obscurity' rather than earn success.

Fame has become decoupled from things that used to be worthy of making people famous.

James Smith · 26:20
#fame#social-media#meritocracy

Explainer· 3

Explainer02:00

Why Swimmers Don't Look That Way Because They Swim

James Smith explains the 'swimmer's body illusion'—the mistaken belief that swimming creates a certain physique. In reality, people with naturally broad, athletic builds are more likely to excel at and stick with swimming, not the other way around. The same applies to many fitness pursuits: people don't pick the sport, the sport picks them based on genetics and predisposition.

  • The 'swimmer's body' is not caused by swimming, but by genetic predisposition to have that body type.
  • People with athletic builds are naturally drawn to and succeed in sports like swimming or rugby.
  • In fitness, people who genetically respond well to training are more likely to continue, creating a selection bias.
  • This pattern applies broadly: you don't pick your sport, your sport picks you.

Swimmers don't always look the way they look because they swim. They swim because of the way they look.

James Smith · 02:20
#fitness#genetics#psychology#myth-busting
Explainer18:00

Why People Get Hooked on Moral Outrage

James suggests that many people express moral outrage not because they're truly offended, but because it gives them a rare sense of passion. In a world where most people live passionless lives, self-righteousness provides a 'fire in the belly'—a feeling so addictive that people seek it through online conflict.

  • Moral outrage often stems from a craving for passion, not genuine offense.
  • Many people are disconnected from their values and never experience true passion.
  • Online righteousness becomes a substitute for meaningful engagement.
  • People get 'hooked' on the feeling of being morally superior.

For once they feel passion. And I think a lot of people are inspired to be politically correct... because it's the only time in the…

James Smith · 19:20
#moral-outrage#psychology#social-media
Explainer61:00

Why Comfortable Choices Lead to Dissatisfaction

James explains that people often confuse comfort with enjoyment, choosing easy, familiar activities over challenging but rewarding ones. Over time, this leads to a dissatisfying life. Growth requires choosing discomfort, like trying a new class, over passive entertainment.

  • Comfortable activities (e.g., watching TV) are often mistaken for enjoyable ones.
  • Future-you would prefer you do something memorable, even if awkward.
  • Optimizing for short-term comfort leads to long-term dissatisfaction.
  • Discomfort is a sign of growth and meaningful experience.

A lot of the time when you consider how future-you would have wanted you to spend your time right now, it involves doing something enjoyable—but…

James Smith · 61:10
#personal-growth#psychology#life-choices

Story· 1

Story08:45

The Bodybuilder's Secret Pump Cover Trick

James shares the 'pump cover' tactic used by bodybuilders: wearing oversized hoodies to hide their physique until they're fully warmed up, then dramatically removing the cover to reveal an impressive pump. This creates a moment of awe and alpha status in the gym, showcasing a subculture that values stealthy displays of physical transformation.

  • Bodybuilders wear baggy clothes to conceal their physique until peak pump.
  • They remove the cover at the optimal moment to maximize visual impact.
  • The practice is about earning attention through effort, not seeking it immediately.
  • Canadian bodybuilder Sebbum is famous for this technique.

You wait until everyone's in the gym, people are away from the water fountains, and then you uncover your top... everyone just thought you were…

James Smith · 09:20
#bodybuilding#gym-culture#fitness-psychology

Q&A· 1

Q&A04:30

Is It Okay to Look at People in the Gym?

James Smith discusses the nuance of eye contact in gym settings, arguing that context matters. While prolonged staring can be inappropriate, brief observation is natural and often part of assessing technique. He emphasizes awareness and respect to avoid making others uncomfortable, especially in environments where people may already feel self-conscious.

  • Context determines whether a gaze is inquisitive or inappropriate.
  • Men should be mindful not to make others feel objectified in shared spaces like gyms.
  • Brief observation of form or equipment use is normal and not inherently disrespectful.
  • Communication and awareness can prevent misunderstandings.

There's probably an objective measure of when an inquisitive gaze becomes a gaze with intent.

James Smith · 04:50
#gym-culture#social-norms#gender-dynamics

Takeaway· 2

Takeaway25:00

Jiu-Jitsu as a True Meritocracy

James praises jiu-jitsu as one of the last true meritocracies, where status is earned through effort and time, not fame or social media. The belt system reflects years of work, and the culture respects hierarchy, camaraderie, and mutual growth—values often missing in modern life.

  • Belt rank in jiu-jitsu is directly proportional to effort and time invested.
  • It's a rare space where fame and social status don't grant privilege.
  • The culture fosters respect, mentorship, and global brotherhood.
  • It provides a sense of purpose that can't be taken away.

Your work put in is directly related to the belt that you carry around your waist. What you're showing with the belt is all of…

James Smith · 25:50
#jiu-jitsu#meritocracy#personal-growth
Takeaway64:00

Real Confidence Comes From Handling Failure

James redefines confidence not as a result of success, but as resilience in the face of failure. He argues that true confidence is measured by how little failure phases you, and that people should redefine 'winning' as taking action, not achieving outcomes.

  • Confidence is not about success, but about how you handle failure.
  • Winning should be redefined as taking action, not getting the desired result.
  • Losing is a valuable reality check and source of inspiration.
  • Growth comes from embracing discomfort and risk.

I'm actually confident because losing doesn't phase me. Things going wrong doesn't phase me.

James Smith · 65:10
#confidence#failure#personal-growth