The 'Stockholm syndrome' of a breakout role
Braff describes the double edge of a career-defining part: it is what everyone wants, but audiences fall in love with the character and stop seeing you as anything else. He nearly internalized it himself, wondering if he was 'just a JD kind of guy.' Williamson reframes it: when someone changes, people who do not want to update their worldview resist, whether it is an actor breaking type or a friend getting healthy. The label is their problem to update, not yours.
- Breakout roles rarely convert into a whole new range of opportunities (Cranston is the rare exception).
- You risk believing the outside world's narrow view of you.
- Small out-of-type parts (Bad Monkey, a Tribeca drama) rebuilt Braff's confidence.
- When you change, others must update their view of you, and some resist.
“a kind of almost like a kind of Stockholm Syndrome for your own success.”
“It's their problem. It's that person's issue to try and update their view of you as an evolving and changing person.”