Why Scientists Can't Agree on What Life Is
Despite studying life, biologists often avoid defining it because the concept is so broad and complex. Even within science, there's no consensus on a single definition of life, leading to confusion when discussing viruses, extremophiles, or potential alien life.
- Scientists in different fields use conflicting definitions of life.
- Many biologists focus narrowly on specific organisms and avoid the big philosophical question.
- NASA's working definition — 'a chemically self-sustained system capable of Darwinian evolution' — is one of the most cited but not universally accepted.
- The lack of agreement becomes problematic when discussing edge cases like viruses or synthetic biology.
“Imagine like in chemistry people didn't agree on what an atom is — that would be kind of problematic, and yet we're in this situation…”