MModern Wisdom
← All episodes
David Geary01 May 2023

Why Science Says Men & Women Will Never Be The Same - David Geary - #622

0Frameworks
24Insights

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 2

Myth Buster01:30

The Gender Equality Paradox: More Equal Countries, Fewer Women in STEM

Geary's 2018 cross-country study found the opposite of the standard prediction — as nations become wealthier and more gender-equal, the proportion of women earning degrees in inorganic sciences (computer science, engineering, physics) actually shrinks rather than converging with men.

  • Standard theory predicted sex differences in STEM would shrink as gender equality rose
  • Data across countries showed the opposite: the STEM gender gap widened with more gender equality
  • Effect held specifically for inorganic sciences (CS, engineering, physics)

as countries became more gender equal, there were proportionately fewer women going into these inorganic sciences

David Geary · 03:00
#stem#gender-equality-paradox#sex-differences
Myth Buster38:00

The Study That Undercuts 'Kids Just Copy Their Parents' on Toy Preference

Geary cites a decades-old study comparing traditional and non-traditional ('hippie') parents who raised kids to believe cross-sex toys were fine. Kids from both groups said it was okay for girls to play with trucks and boys with dolls — but when actually observed playing, both groups of kids still chose sex-typical toys, showing stated beliefs didn't change actual behavior.

  • Non-traditional parents raised kids believing cross-sex play was fine
  • Kids from both traditional and non-traditional homes said cross-sex play was acceptable
  • Observed play behavior was equally sex-typical regardless of upbringing
  • Suggests children are 'calling the shots' on their own play preferences rather than just mirroring parental socialization

their beliefs about what's okay... mirrored to some extent what their parents said, but then when you cut them loose and watch how they actually…

David Geary · 39:00
#social-roles-theory#child-development#toy-preference

Hot Take· 4

Hot Take00:30

Why the Sex Differences Debate Keeps Flaring Up

Geary argues the modern controversy over sex differences research isn't about the science itself but about ideology — some people reject any biological basis for human traits, and gender activists specifically resist the idea that biology contributes to outcomes like STEM participation.

  • Some people reject biological explanations for any human trait
  • Gender activists resist linking sex differences to socially important outcomes like STEM participation
  • The controversy cycles up and down over time rather than being new

there are gender activists who don't want to believe that there are differences between men and women that have a biological basis to them

David Geary · 00:30
#sex-differences#controversy#ideology
Hot Take17:30

The 'Sedation Hypothesis' for Why Disaffected Men Aren't Rioting

Despite record male sexlessness, joblessness, and disengagement, society hasn't seen the expected spike in male violence and disorder. Geary and the host propose a 'sedation hypothesis': porn, video games, and social media deliver a titrated dose of status-seeking and reproduction-adjacent stimulation, combined with disability payments and living with parents, that keeps disengaged men just satisfied enough not to revolt.

  • ~30% of men aged 18-30 haven't had sex in the past year; ~50% aren't looking for relationships
  • Expected rise in crime/disorder from disengaged men hasn't materialized
  • Porn, video games, and social media provide just enough simulated status/reward to prevent revolt
  • Disability payments and living with parents provide passive income cushioning the discontent

you've got porn, video games, social media that are kind of nursing the desire for status seeking, for goal orientation and for reproduction and giving…

David Geary · 17:30
#men#sedation-hypothesis#social-crisis
Hot Take61:30

Why Throwing Accuracy Is the Strongest Argument in the Trans-in-Sport Debate

The host argues that beyond muscle mass and bone density (which hormone therapy partially addresses), the deeper issue for transgender athletes in sport is a fundamental, hormonally-set cognitive/perceptual capability — like throwing accuracy and spatial tracking — that isn't reversed by post-puberty testosterone suppression, since these traits are set by early hormone exposure, not adult circulating testosterone.

  • The common trans-athlete debate focuses on power/muscle mass, addressed partly by hormone suppression
  • The host argues the deeper unaddressed issue is perceptual/spatial capability (e.g. throwing accuracy), not just strength
  • Geary confirms spatial/perceptual traits track early (prenatal/early postnatal) hormone exposure, not adult circulating testosterone levels
  • Implies hormone therapy would not equalize these specific capability differences

male's capacity is overclocked and it is supercharged comparatively with women

host · 63:30

some of the spatial differences and the perceptual differences... are more strongly related to prenatal or an early postnatal hormonal exposure than actual circulating testosterone

David Geary · 64:30
#transgender#sport#hot-take#spatial-ability
Hot Take71:00

Physical Weapons vs Social Weapons: Reframing Male and Female Traits

The host proposes a striking frame: men's physical traits (brow ridge, jaw, hand size) function as their weapons for intersexual and intergroup competition, while women's social-cognitive skills (reading faces, manipulating social dynamics, coalition-building) function as their equivalent 'weaponry' — evolved because open physical conflict was riskier for women, especially while pregnant or caring for children.

  • Host frames male physical features as literal competitive 'weapons'
  • Frames female social/emotional intelligence as an equivalent, non-physical 'weaponry' — offensive, defensive, and coalitional
  • Physical risk of conflict was historically higher for women, especially when pregnant or with dependent children, favoring indirect social tactics
  • Geary agrees men also engage in relational aggression/politics, but at the scale of organizing large groups rather than manipulating small networks

the ability to understand and manipulate social dynamics, language ability, reading facial expressions — that is female weaponry

host · 71:00
#hot-take#sex-differences#evolution

Explainer· 11

Explainer00:00

Brain Scans Can Predict a Kid's Sex 93% of the Time

Geary explains that structural brain-pattern differences between boys and girls are large enough that a 10-year-old's brain scan predicts their sex correctly about 93% of the time, nearly matching adult face-based sex prediction accuracy. The gap widens with age, and even prenatal brain-activity scans show measurable differences by six months gestation.

  • Whole-brain pattern (not single regions) predicts a 10-year-old's sex ~93% of the time
  • Adult brain scans reach ~95% accuracy
  • Sex differences appear in fetal brain-activity scans around 6 months prenatally
  • Individual brain regions show small differences; the whole coordinated pattern shows large ones

you can take a brain pattern of a 10 year old and predict whether that brain belongs to a boy or a girl about 93…

host · 00:00
#neuroscience#sex-differences#brain
Explainer03:30

Why Ability Isn't the Whole Story on Who Picks STEM

Geary explains that career choice is driven less by absolute ability and more by 'intra-individual strength' — your best subject relative to your own other subjects. Girls' best subject is disproportionately reading, so even girls strong in math still gravitate toward reading-heavy fields.

  • Career choice tracks comparative advantage, not just raw ability
  • Girls' strongest relative subject worldwide tends to be reading
  • Even girls with high absolute math/science ability may choose reading-heavy fields if reading is their comparative strength

if their strength is reading they're still more likely to go into other fields than STEM related

David Geary · 04:00
#stem#career-choice#cognition
Explainer06:00

Reading and Math Are Too New to Be 'Evolved' Sex Differences

Geary clarifies that reading and mathematics are evolutionarily novel skills (only a few thousand years old), so neither sex 'evolved' to be good at them directly. Instead, reading piggybacks on language and theory-of-mind systems where women have advantages, while math performance gaps trace mainly to spatial ability, not a dedicated 'math gene.'

  • Reading and math are too recent evolutionarily to be direct adaptations
  • Reading skill rides on language and theory-of-mind systems, where women have an edge
  • Overall mean math differences are small; the real gap shows up in spatial-heavy areas like geometry and word problems
  • More men than women appear at the very high end of math performance (~3:1), a ratio that has narrowed since the 1990s

both reading and mathematics are evolutionarily novel abilities... it just doesn't make sense

David Geary · 06:00
#cognition#math#reading#evolution
Explainer09:00

The 60/40 College Gap and the 'Tall Girl Problem'

Geary discusses how the conversation around getting women into higher ed has quietly disappeared because women now out-graduate men roughly 60/40 in the US and other Western countries. He connects this to what the host dubs the 'tall girl problem' — a surplus of educated women competing for a shrinking pool of similarly educated, ambitious men, linked to delayed marriage, higher divorce, and more casual sex.

  • US college completion is roughly 60% women to 40% men
  • Girls have historically liked school more and adapted better to classroom conformity than boys
  • More educated women than men distorts the 'operational sex ratio,' increasing competition among women for fewer educated men
  • Associated with delayed marriage, higher divorce rates, and more casual/unprotected sex

more educated women than men leads to more competition among women for a smaller base of educated and ambitious men

David Geary · 11:00

tall girl problem

host · 11:00
#education#gender-gap#dating-market
Explainer24:30

Why the Height Gap Between Men and Women Grows With Prosperity

Geary explains a lesser-known piece of evidence for the gender equality paradox: as populations become wealthier and healthier (better medicine, food, sanitation), the sex difference in height actually increases, because male genetic growth potential is less suppressed by poor nutrition. He's now investigating whether the same health-driven mechanism increases sex differences in spatial and verbal-memory cognition.

  • Sex difference in height grows in wealthier, healthier populations — a nutrition/health effect, not a direct gender-equality effect
  • Better health allows male genetic height potential to be fully expressed
  • Geary hypothesizes the same mechanism increases male spatial-ability advantages and female verbal-memory advantages as population health improves
  • Nutritional supplement studies in developing nations show boys' competitiveness and activity gains are largest with improved nutrition

the physical sex differences get bigger because the overall health of the population gets better... not only are the psychological sex differences expressed better, the…

David Geary · 25:00
#height#health#sex-differences#evolution
Explainer30:30

'Folk Psychology' vs 'Folk Physics': The Universal Cognitive Split

Geary frames the most robust, cross-cultural cognitive sex differences not as narrow academic skills like math, but as two broad skill clusters: 'folk psychology' (reading faces, body language, tone, theory of mind — the toolkit for one-on-one relationships), where women have a large combined advantage, and 'folk physics' (navigation, tracking moving objects, mechanical reasoning), where men have the edge.

  • Individual component skills (facial reading, theory of mind, etc.) show only small-to-moderate female advantages
  • Combined as an integrated skill set used in real interactions, the female advantage becomes large (~85-90% of women outperform the average man)
  • 'Folk physics' — navigation, object-trajectory tracking, mechanical reasoning — shows a male advantage
  • These patterns are considered human universals, not culturally taught

if we look at the entire constellation of skills as they're working together in an interaction... girls and women have fairly large advantages, probably about…

David Geary · 32:00
#cognition#folk-psychology#folk-physics#sex-differences
Explainer50:00

The Hormonal Mechanism Behind Boy vs Girl Play Preferences

Geary explains that prenatal testosterone exposure plus a second postnatal testosterone spike in the first six months of life partly drive sex-typical play. Girls with higher prenatal androgen exposure show play patterns closer to boys, suggesting attentional biases toward biological vs. mechanical motion are hormonally shaped rather than purely learned.

  • There's a second testosterone spike in the first 6 months after birth, in addition to prenatal exposure
  • Girls with higher prenatal androgen exposure show more boy-typical play behaviors
  • The mechanism works through what captures attention (biological motion vs. physical/mechanical motion) and built-in reward systems
#testosterone#hormones#child-development
Explainer56:30

The Huge, Early Sex Gap in Throwing Accuracy and Velocity

Geary details one of the largest and earliest-emerging physical sex differences: throwing distance, velocity, and accuracy. The gap appears in preschoolers and becomes extremely large by adulthood, with almost no overlap between men and women, tied to differences in shoulder/forearm architecture and the brain's dorsal visual stream for tracking moving objects.

  • Boys outthrow girls in distance, speed, and accuracy starting in preschool
  • By early adulthood, the gap is extremely large with minimal overlap between sexes
  • Linked to prenatally-evident differences in shoulder and forearm architecture
  • Tied to the dorsal visual stream's role in tracking moving objects, needed both to throw and to dodge
#physical-differences#throwing#sex-differences
Explainer66:30

Why Male Friend Groups Bond Over Activities and Female Ones Over Talk

Geary contrasts male social networks, which tend to be larger, task- or competition-oriented (e.g., watching sports together), with female networks, which are built on dyadic, emotionally intimate friendships requiring high sensitivity to a friend's emotional state — even unspoken cues.

  • Male groups bond through shared activity/competition (e.g. watching a game together) without needing much conversation
  • Female friendships are built on one-on-one emotional support and require reading subtle emotional cues
  • Reading a friend's unspoken distress ('theory of mind') is central to maintaining close female friendships
#social-networks#friendship#sex-differences
Explainer69:30

Relational Aggression: The 'Mean Girls' Weapon System

Geary explains relational aggression — subtle gossip, put-downs, and lie-spreading designed to damage a rival's social network and reputation — as most effective when plausibly deniable. He contrasts it with male conflict, which tends to be direct (eye contact, pushing, yelling), arguing women need sharper social skills to both wield and detect this kind of covert aggression.

  • Relational aggression (gossip, subtle put-downs, rumor-spreading) targets a rival's social network and romantic prospects
  • Most effective when plausibly deniable, unlike direct male confrontation
  • Requires strong social-cue-reading skill both to execute and to detect/counter it
  • Geary frames this as central to the female advantage in social-emotional skills

it is most effective if it's done in a way that is plausibly deniable

David Geary · 70:00
#relational-aggression#social-dynamics#sex-differences
Explainer73:30

Why Transgender Diagnoses Spiked — and Shifted From Male to Female

Geary explains that historically, transgender individuals were disproportionately male with a childhood history of gender dysphoria and cross-sex play, and detransition rates were low (1-2%). In the last decade, the demographic has flipped toward adolescent girls, most without that earlier history, which Geary attributes to social media and adolescent girls' heightened susceptibility to social contagion within tight peer networks. Detransition/regret rates have also climbed sharply, in some measures to as high as one in three.

  • Historically transgender individuals skewed male, with childhood gender dysphoria and cross-sex play patterns, and low (1-2%) detransition rates
  • In the last decade, cases have spiked well beyond what brain-pattern data would predict, now skewing toward adolescent girls
  • Most recent cases lack the earlier markers (dysphoria history, cross-sex play)
  • Geary attributes this to social media and girls' networks being more susceptible to social contagion to maintain group belonging
  • Detransition/regret rates have risen from ~1-2% historically to as high as one in three by some recent measures

I think the girl networks are more susceptible to social contagion and going along with ideas that maybe aren't a good idea just to fit…

David Geary · 77:30
#transgender#social-contagion#adolescents

Story· 5

Story13:30

Seven Million Men Have Simply Opted Out of Work

Citing Nicholas Eberstat's research, the host and Geary discuss a cohort of roughly seven million prime-working-age US men (22-55) who are unemployed and not seeking work, spending about 2,000 hours a year on screens, with half that time involving prescription drugs or weed, and two-thirds living in a household claiming a disability benefit.

  • ~7 million prime-age US men are unemployed and not looking for work
  • They average ~2,000 hours/year watching screens; half that time involves drugs or weed
  • Two-thirds live in a household claiming at least one disability benefit
  • Geary links it to disappearing industrial-base jobs that once integrated working-class men into the workforce and culture

there's this cohort of prime working aged 22 to 55 year old men, seven million of which are unemployed and not seeking work... two-thirds of…

host · 13:30
#men#unemployment#social-crisis
Story20:00

How a BuzzFeed Hit Piece Became the 'Debunking' of an Inconvenient Finding

Geary recounts the backlash to his 2018 gender-equality-paradox paper — hostile emails, pressure on journal editors to retract, and a published commentary using a female-biased 'gender equality' measure to reject the finding. When Geary's team used their own neutral well-being measure, the paradox held, but critics ran a BuzzFeed hit piece anyway, which now gets cited as if the finding were debunked.

  • The paper drew attack emails and pressure on the journal to retract
  • Critics used a female-biased measure (e.g., % women in Parliament) to challenge the result
  • Geary's team's neutral 'well-being' measure (education access, healthy lifespan, life satisfaction) still showed the paradox
  • A BuzzFeed article and a published commentary are now cited as 'debunking' the finding, short-circuiting real debate

now there's this BuzzFeed thing and there's this commentary on our original article so when people bring up the gender equality paradox in stem, they…

David Geary · 23:30
#academia#controversy#gender-equality-paradox
Story41:00

Even Vervet Monkeys Show Sex-Typed Toy Preferences

Geary describes a study (replicated in macaques) where juvenile vervet monkeys were given human-typical toys — a doll and a truck. Female monkeys preferred the doll more than males did, while males were more likely to approach novel objects, suggesting the toy preference isn't purely a product of human culture.

  • Female vervet monkeys/macaques preferred a doll over males
  • Male monkeys showed more novelty-seeking/risk-taking toward new objects
  • No evolutionary history of trucks in monkeys — suggests preference may relate to the type of motion (dorsal visual stream) rather than the toy's cultural meaning

the females like the dolls more than the males do... the males are also more likely to approach novel types of things

David Geary · 41:30
#primates#toy-preference#evolution
Story45:00

How Preschool Play Already Splits by Sex: Warfare vs. Nurturing

Building on researcher Joyce Benenson's work, Geary discusses how by age 3-5, before much socialization has occurred, boys' pretend play tends to center on coordinated group conflict (fighting cowboys, aliens) while girls' play centers on nurturing (keeping a doll or toy 'alive'). Vocabulary differences between boys and girls emerge as early as 18 months.

  • Boys' play organizes into larger coordinated groups often centered on conflict/warfare themes
  • Girls' play centers on nurturing themes (caring for a doll, animal, etc.)
  • Vocabulary divergence begins in the second year of life — 18-month-old girls talk more about clothing, boys about objects
  • Geary connects boys' group-conflict play to preparation for coalitional male-male competition and cooperative hunting later in life

boys are creating these groups because these are the groups they're going to grow up with and later in some cases fight with or cooperatively…

David Geary · 49:00
#child-development#play-behavior#sex-differences
Story58:30

The Tennis-Ball-Machine Study on Dodging Ability

Geary recounts a study where researchers fired tennis balls from a machine at undergraduates to test dodging ability. Men blocked nearly all the balls (a ceiling effect), while women were markedly less successful — evidence, Geary argues, that male advantages in tracking and reacting to projectiles likely predate hunting and originated in male-male combat.

  • The study fired tennis balls at undergrads to measure dodge/block success
  • Men hit a 'ceiling effect,' blocking almost all balls; women were notably less successful
  • Geary argues this dodging ability likely predates hunting, originating in projectile-based male-male competition

men blocked most of them, in fact there was a ceiling effect, and women were not as successful

David Geary · 59:00
#physical-differences#study#male-competition

Tool· 2

Tool13:00

Two Must-Reads on the Male Malaise

The host recommends two books on the crisis facing boys and men: Richard Reeves' short, accessible 'Of Boys and Men' covering structural issues in education, employment, and the home, and Nicholas Eberstat's academic work 'Men Without Work' on the collapse of male labor-force participation.

  • 'Of Boys and Men' by Richard Reeves — short (~150-200 pages), covers education, employment, and home-life issues for boys and men
  • 'Men Without Work' by Nicholas Eberstat — economic analysis of male labor-force dropout
#books#men#recommendations
Tool83:00

David Geary's Book: Male, Female (3rd Edition)

Geary points listeners to the third edition of his book 'Male, Female,' published in 2021, as the most up-to-date and thoroughly documented source on the sex differences research discussed throughout the episode.

  • Third edition published in 2021
  • Covers the sex-differences research base in detail, given the topic's controversy
  • Geary offers to send additional articles on sex-specific evolutionary vulnerabilities to anyone who emails him
#books#recommendation#sex-differences