MModern Wisdom
← All episodes
George MacGill06 May 2019

Mental Models 101 - How To Make Better Decisions - George MacGill - #069

9Frameworks
14Insights

Listen

Frameworks in this episode

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Myth Buster· 1

Myth Buster63:30

You don't rise to the occasion, you sink to your training

MacGill busts the belief that people rise to the occasion — they actually sink to their level of training, the way Navy SEALs and Royal Marines drill everything into consciousness so mistakes never happen. He practises deliberately being 'weird' daily (yoga at service stations) to condition himself, and runs the Asch conformity test monthly with his students so they learn to resist social pressure.

  • People sink to their training, not rise to the occasion
  • Elite units drill responses until mistakes are impossible
  • MacGill practises public weirdness to build the muscle daily
  • The Asch conformity test trains resistance to social pressure

people think they're going to rise to the occasion whereas they actually sink to their level of training

George MacGill · 63:30
#training#conformity#asch#preparation

Hot Take· 3

Hot Take11:00

Why knowledge workers are miserable: no feedback mechanism

Chris Williamson and MacGill argue that pre-modern workers — smiths, carpenters, farmers — had built-in feedback: you can see the ploughed field or the fixed car. Modern knowledge work has none; you answer 100 emails and receive 103, with no signal of whether you did a good job. They tie this to an inverted Maslow's hierarchy where the bottom is over-serviced and the top under-serviced, creating an existential crisis.

  • Craft and trade work carried inherent, visible feedback and pride
  • Knowledge work offers no signal of a job well done
  • Maslow's pyramid has flipped: comfort abundant, self-actualisation starved
  • Neurons that fire together wire together (Cal Newport's Deep Work)

you wake up you had 100 emails you go to bed you've done 100 but received 103... did I do a good job I have…

Chris Williamson · 11:00
#feedback#knowledge-work#maslow#meaning
Hot Take29:30

Identity: you drill beliefs into yourself, not the outside world

MacGill explains that when you publicly declare 'I believe X', you think you're persuading others but you're really cementing it into your own identity. This can be a superpower (James Clear's identity-based habit of being 'a non-smoker') or a trap — Cialdini avoided signing petitions he agreed with, because identifying with a cause made clear thinking harder.

  • Public declarations drill beliefs inward, not outward
  • Identity-based habits (Clear's 'non-smoker') can lock in good behaviour
  • Cialdini refused to sign petitions to protect his objectivity
  • Identity can be a superpower or the death of you

as soon as you identify as something... it can even be a superpower or like the death of you

George MacGill · 30:00
#identity#habits#cialdini#james-clear
Hot Take56:00

Steal from video games: parameters, levels and third-person identity

MacGill notes the gaming industry is worth more than music and movies combined, so its designers understand human psychology better than anyone — yet elite gamers are often a mess in real life. He asks what real life is missing that games provide: clear falsifiable parameters, visible levels of progression, escapism, community, and a third-person view of your character (identity detachment).

  • Gaming outsizes music and film combined in value and psychology
  • Games give clear parameters; real life offers unlimited overwhelming choice
  • Games have visible levels; real goals jump from level zero to ten and people quit
  • Seeing your life in third person (like a game character) detaches identity from failure

whoever takes these psychology models from video games and applies them to real life is gonna win big

George MacGill · 60:30
#video-games#psychology#identity#gamification

Explainer· 5

Explainer01:30

Mental models are apps you plug into your mind's operating system

George MacGill frames mental models as recipes for regular decision-making — apps you plug into your consciousness, which acts like an operating system. He credits Charlie Munger's 'latticework' idea of taking the highest-leverage ~10% from each big discipline (physics, biology, microeconomics) rather than specialising deep in one. Over time his definition loosened to any analogy that helps him explain things.

  • Consciousness is the OS; mental models are apps for different situations
  • Munger's latticework pulls from physics, biology, microeconomics and more
  • Take the 10% of a field that covers 90% of it, Tim Ferriss style
  • The looser definition: any analogy that helps you explain the world

mental models are just various sort of apps that you like plug in for like various decisions or situations

George MacGill · 01:30
#mental-models#munger#latticework#decision-making
Explainer08:00

The power of contrast: why the best era to be alive still feels miserable

MacGill argues contrast is the most important driver of human happiness, and that we constantly benchmark against the wrong reference points. Instagram feeds you ten-out-of-ten lives so your eight feels like a minus; a hospital ward full of dying people flips the contrast the other way. He ties it to Munger's frog-in-boiling-water metaphor and the hedonic treadmill.

  • Contrast, not absolute conditions, sets felt happiness
  • Instagram is artificial lives engineered to make yours look worse
  • A hospital ward is an inverse Instagram feed that resets your baseline
  • Munger's boiling-frog metaphor shows gradual change goes unnoticed

contrast is probably the most important thing for like human happiness

George MacGill · 08:30

when you walk around the hospital ward where people are dying your contrasting your eight out of ten with... a zero

George MacGill · 12:30
#contrast#happiness#hedonic-treadmill#social-media
Explainer26:00

Doublethink: hold two opposite beliefs and avoid the grey middle

MacGill flips the usual advice, arguing you want black-AND-white thinking (holding two extremes) rather than grey compromise, which is 'where you go to die'. He links it to Orwell's doublethink and Taleb's barbell strategy: intense deep focus paired with intense socialisation, egoless training paired with fight-week invincibility.

  • Hold two contradictory beliefs at once, Orwell's doublethink
  • Taleb's barbell: occupy both extreme ends, not the middle
  • John Kavanagh trains fighters egoless, then wants them invincible on fight week
  • Matthew Syed's golfer: total self-doubt before the swing, total confidence during

black and white thinking is so underrated and... the shades of grey is where you go to die

George MacGill · 26:30
#doublethink#barbell#paradox#mindset
Explainer28:30

Steelmanning and Munger's iron prescription against cognitive bias

To counter cognitive biases like white-and-white or black-and-black thinking, MacGill invokes Munger's 'iron prescription': never hold or voice an opinion unless you can state the opposing view better than its advocates. He illustrates the failure mode with the Jimmy Kimmel experiment where Hillary supporters praised policies that turned out to be Trump's, revealing pure cognitive dissonance.

  • Steelman the other side to escape biased thinking
  • Munger's iron prescription: out-argue the opposing view before holding yours
  • The Kimmel experiment exposed identity-driven dissonance
  • Publicly declaring beliefs drills them into yourself, not just others

he refuses to have or state publicly an opinion on something unless he can state the opposing opinion better than the other side

George MacGill · 29:00
#steelman#munger#cognitive-bias#identity
Explainer40:30

The Lollapalooza effect: when biases compound into something crazy

MacGill calls the Lollapalooza effect (from Munger) the ultimate meta mental model — when multiple cognitive biases stack and compound simultaneously, you get an outsized, irrational outcome. His example is an auction, where social proof, contrast, consistency bias, authority bias, and sunk-cost fallacy all fire together, which is why Buffett and Munger refuse to attend auctions.

  • Multiple biases compounding together create extreme effects
  • Auctions stack social proof, contrast, consistency, authority and sunk cost
  • Buffett and Munger refuse auctions after being burned
  • Mental models rarely appear alone; they interlink like a latticework

a lot of poser effect is when you have like five or six of these things working together and just compounding

George MacGill · 41:30
#lollapalooza#cognitive-bias#munger#auctions

Story· 3

Story15:00

The three-buckets experiment that proves contrast beats objective reality

MacGill recounts the classic hands-in-buckets experiment (attributing it to Cialdini's work) demonstrating the power of contrast. One hand goes in freezing water, the other in hot, for a minute, then both into lukewarm neutral water. The previously cold hand feels the neutral water as hot, the hot hand feels it as cold — despite identical temperature.

  • Left hand in freezing water, right hand in boiling, for one minute
  • Both then move to identical lukewarm water
  • The cold hand perceives hot, the hot hand perceives cold
  • Objective temperature is identical; only the contrast differs

objectively the water is the exact same temperature but it's just what your contrasting against

George MacGill · 15:30
#contrast#perception#cialdini#psychology
Story66:00

The rat experiment: run toward what you want and away from what you fear

Williamson relays Jordan Peterson's rat experiment: a starving rat runs toward cheese with measurable force, but when the smell of a cat is added behind it, the rat pulls even harder. The lesson is you need both motivations — running toward something you want and away from something you fear. Peterson's Self Authoring exercise contrasts your best-habits and worst-habits futures to harness both.

  • A starving rat runs hardest when also fleeing a feared predator
  • You need both attraction to reward and aversion to fear
  • Self Authoring contrasts best-habit and worst-habit futures
  • The stark contrast between the two futures drives action

not only do you need to run towards something that you want but you need to run away from something that you fear

Chris Williamson · 66:30
#motivation#jordan-peterson#fear#self-authoring
Story16:30

The Munger speech that seeded Farnam Street and the mental-models movement

MacGill traces the modern mental-models movement to Charlie Munger's Stanford speech 'The Psychology of Human Misjudgment', which breaks down bias by bias. That speech triggered Shane Parrish to start the Farnam Street blog (named after Berkshire's old address), which curates a list of 109 mental models — a free resource MacGill calls one of the best on the internet.

  • Munger's 'Psychology of Human Misjudgment' is the seminal source
  • It triggered Shane Parrish to start Farnam Street
  • Farnam Street is named after Berkshire Hathaway's old address
  • The blog's list of 109 mental models is free and foundational

Charlie Munger's psychology of human misjudgment was basically what triggered Shane parish to start this blog

Chris Williamson · 17:00
#munger#farnam-street#shane-parrish#origin-story

Takeaway· 2

Takeaway41:30

Effectiveness over efficiency: don't speed up in the wrong direction

A Shane Parrish distinction: efficiency is going faster, effectiveness is going in the right direction. Naval reportedly refuses to use Alfred because it just makes him faster at moving in a suboptimal direction. Adding speed to a poor direction only sends you further the wrong way — and it ties directly to the sunk-cost fallacy.

  • Efficiency is speed; effectiveness is correct direction
  • Speeding up a wrong direction sends you further astray
  • Naval avoids optimising tools that accelerate bad trajectories
  • Cut losses rather than continue from sunk cost

he's like adding speed on top of a poor direction he's just sending you further in the wrong way

Chris Williamson · 42:00
#effectiveness#efficiency#sunk-cost#naval
Takeaway61:00

Different outputs demand different inputs: embrace being weird

From computer science: if you want different outputs you must change your inputs. MacGill pairs it with Sam Altman's 'extreme people get extreme results, normal people get normal results' and argues embracing weirdness is essential because being normal regresses you to the mean. He cites Alain de Botton's line that loneliness is the tax you pay for a certain complexity of mind.

  • Different outputs require different inputs (Einstein's paraphrase)
  • Extreme people get extreme results; normal gets normal (Sam Altman)
  • Wanting different results while acting normal is contradictory
  • Loneliness is a tax for complexity of mind (Alain de Botton)

extreme people get extreme results and then normal people get normal results

George MacGill · 61:30
#inputs-outputs#conformity#sam-altman#de-botton